s**********d
发帖数: 36899 | 1 文盲？
ISO the International Organization for Standardization
标准80000 Quantities and units （The system of quantities, including the
relations among the quantities used as the basis of the units of the SI, is
named the International System of Quantities, denoted ISQ, in all languages）
第二部 Mathematical signs and symbols to be used in the natural sciences and
technology
第12条 Exponential and logarithmic functions
还搞笑的英语单词才得到推广，看看数学符号有多少是英语单词？
你怎么不把log写成logarithmic呢？ |
|
ET
发帖数: 10701 | 2 1. C.C. McAndrew, J. Gates, R. T. Ida and P. Drennan, Efficient statistical
BJT modeling, why b is more than Ic/Ib, IEEE BCTM 1.2 (1997) p 28-31
2. CC . McAndrews, Statistical Modeling for circuit simulation, proceedings
isqed '03 (2003)
3. w.f. davis, R.T. ida, Statisical ic simulation based on independent wafer
extracted process parameters and experimental designs, proc. ieee bctm 1989
, p. 262. 265
//bow.. |
|
|
m******a
发帖数: 91 | 4 个人感觉比较值得的会议，都是IEEE的。
电路设计首推ISSCC，既有学术又有工业界的文章，可以算是天王级别了。出版物很pp
，每个主要作者的照片都镶嵌着，有点journal的意思了。
提的上还有CICC, 貌似比较偏工业界一些。ISCAS, ISLPED和ISQED是很学术的。VLSI
Design也可以，大概印度人比较哈。
再来有CAD四大天王，DAC, DATE, ICCAD和ASP-DAC。前者很商业，剧中的一个在欧洲很
火，一个比较学术（据说是berkeley关税专用？），最后一个就不说了，由于总在亚洲
，水平略逊（无贬低执意）。
欢迎排砖，越狠越好~ |
|
f********o
发帖数: 2181 | 5 一般design的会的排名是
ISSCC > CICC > (RF IC) = VLSI > ESSCIRC 吧
CAD领域明显只有两强DAC和ICCAD
DATE的水平和上面两个差距明显
投到ASPDAC的paper很多(如果不是大多数的话)都是上面两个会议据下来的
另外Berkeley最近几年在ICCAD上paper不多
ISLPED不错, 不过范围小些
ISQED 和 ISCAS的学术水平可能和ASPDAC差不多吧
pp |
|
r****n
发帖数: 918 | 6 depends how you define the term "IC design". :) Circuit design people
usually don't submit paper to CAD. FPGA is another story also.
some of the new conference is getting better year after year, such as ISQED.
My advisor told he did not know what it is until one of my paper got
rejected. :(
DATE is in europe and DAC is in USA, you should have another list for
conference in Europe. |
|
