EB23版 - why push O to use all EB2C quota first? useless |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 1 why push O to use all EB2C quota first? useless and no benefit.
the EB2 current dates will be the same for China and India no matter
EB2C
use all 2800 in May or not
For example
Assume we have 22K rollover.
case 1: EB2C can't use all 2800 number and have 1000 left, then SO
starts.The total SO will be 23K. Both EB2I+C will go to Feb 2007.
case 2: EB2C can use all 2800 number in May. Then SO will be
22K.Current
date will be exactly the same date as Case 1, because the total
available
number is the same.
some EB2C PD around Aug and Sep 2006 can get their green cards 1-2
months
earlier if EB2C can use all 2800 in May. But anyway, they can get their
green card before Sept. That is the only difference!!
and the cut-off date will be exactly the same in case 1 and case 2. | c**s
发帖数: 3796 | 2 是这样。只是不少人能早点绿，能早解决一部分人的 个人家庭身份问题。
【在 p***e 的大作中提到】
: why push O to use all EB2C quota first? useless and no benefit.
: the EB2 current dates will be the same for China and India no matter
: EB2C
: use all 2800 in May or not
: For example
: Assume we have 22K rollover.
: case 1: EB2C can't use all 2800 number and have 1000 left, then SO
: starts.The total SO will be 23K. Both EB2I+C will go to Feb 2007.
: case 2: EB2C can use all 2800 number in May. Then SO will be
: 22K.Current
| p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 3 if the spillover is less than 7k. It will hurt EB2C if we don't use all
2800 in May.
But now the spillover is 12K, it doesn't matter anymore
【在 p***e 的大作中提到】
: why push O to use all EB2C quota first? useless and no benefit.
: the EB2 current dates will be the same for China and India no matter
: EB2C
: use all 2800 in May or not
: For example
: Assume we have 22K rollover.
: case 1: EB2C can't use all 2800 number and have 1000 left, then SO
: starts.The total SO will be 23K. Both EB2I+C will go to Feb 2007.
: case 2: EB2C can use all 2800 number in May. Then SO will be
: 22K.Current
| p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 4 so should we spend more energy on pushing O on other things?
O is not stupid, he knows this situation. It is boring if we keep asking
to use all 2800 in may.
【在 c**s 的大作中提到】
: 是这样。只是不少人能早点绿，能早解决一部分人的 个人家庭身份问题。
| c**s
发帖数: 3796 | 5 EN.
如果这１２０００，一个月给６０００，那么这两个月就有EB－３成功转成EB２的，占
用我们自己的名额。
【在 p***e 的大作中提到】
: if the spillover is less than 7k. It will hurt EB2C if we don't use all
: 2800 in May.
: But now the spillover is 12K, it doesn't matter anymore
| p***e
发帖数: 29053 | 6 good explanation
我这样建议一个很重要的原因是，2006年8月1日是07大潮后EB2C到过的排期最近点（曾
经在08年9月的排期到过这点，姑且称08小潮），很多错过07大潮又错过08小潮的人，
这之后就再也没机会递485了，一旦今年排期突破08/01/2006，这些人就可以递上485，
早一点让EB2C突破这一点，这些人就早一天递上，在最后与老印争抢spillover中也就
为EB2C多抢到一个名额。
因为递上485之后到批准有一段时间间隔，如果他们到8，9月再递，那就抢不到今年的
spillover，就要算到下一年的名额了。
所以有人说只要本财年最终EB2C排期推进到某一日期，EB2C拿到的名额就是确定的，这
样的说法是不对的。宁可早推进 ，后面不动，也不要早不动，到最后来推进。
===================================================================
另外，在奥定排期的过程中，他是根据现有485
inventory来数人数，数到第N个人他的PD就是排期。但是当排期推进后，会有新的485
交上来，排期一旦确定，能往里多塞多少人就中国EB2就多赚多少人。因为485从交上到
批准有好几个月，这些多塞进去的人，越早塞进去，在本财年末被批的可能性就越高，
越到后面塞进去，越不可能抢到今年的名额，就要被算到下一财年。本财年结束后，本
来奥预计给中国比如5000，但如果中国实际拿了5500，你多吃的已经吃下去了，他也没
办法让你吐出来了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
