s**d
发帖数: 516 | 1 因为6月的Bulletin说的很清楚了：Therefore, it was necessary to make the China
and India Employment Second preference category “Unavailable” in early
April, and it will remain so for the remainder of FY-2012.
Numbers will once again be available for China and India Employment Second
preference cases beginning October 1, 2012 under the FY-2013 annual
numerical limitations. Every effort will be made to return the China and
India Employment Second preference cut-off date to the May 1, 2010 date
which had been reached in April 2012. Readers should be advised that it is
impossible to accurately estimate how long that may take, but current
indications are that it would definitely not occur before spring 2013. |
l****i
发帖数: 3339 | |
s********f
发帖数: 84 | 3 dreamer321 你妈妈喊你回家吃饭了！
China
is
【在 s**d 的大作中提到】
: 因为6月的Bulletin说的很清楚了：Therefore, it was necessary to make the China
: and India Employment Second preference category “Unavailable” in early
: April, and it will remain so for the remainder of FY-2012.
: Numbers will once again be available for China and India Employment Second
: preference cases beginning October 1, 2012 under the FY-2013 annual
: numerical limitations. Every effort will be made to return the China and
: India Employment Second preference cut-off date to the May 1, 2010 date
: which had been reached in April 2012. Readers should be advised that it is
: impossible to accurately estimate how long that may take, but current
: indications are that it would definitely not occur before spring 2013.
|
s*******n
发帖数: 688 | |
r*******8
发帖数: 449 | 5 赫赫，上个月说3类最多前进6个周，结果4个月多。
所以，这些东西要当真就当真，改变的时候就不要当真。
China
is
【在 s**d 的大作中提到】
: 因为6月的Bulletin说的很清楚了：Therefore, it was necessary to make the China
: and India Employment Second preference category “Unavailable” in early
: April, and it will remain so for the remainder of FY-2012.
: Numbers will once again be available for China and India Employment Second
: preference cases beginning October 1, 2012 under the FY-2013 annual
: numerical limitations. Every effort will be made to return the China and
: India Employment Second preference cut-off date to the May 1, 2010 date
: which had been reached in April 2012. Readers should be advised that it is
: impossible to accurately estimate how long that may take, but current
: indications are that it would definitely not occur before spring 2013.
|
s**d
发帖数: 516 | 6 多年的经验告诉我们，锦上添花是可能的，雪上加霜也是可能的，所以别存什么幻想了。
【在 r*******8 的大作中提到】
: 赫赫，上个月说3类最多前进6个周，结果4个月多。
: 所以，这些东西要当真就当真，改变的时候就不要当真。
:
: China
: is
|
rh
发帖数: 3901 | |
g**********g
发帖数: 18118 | 8 SO= split order
ROW= rest of world
【在 rh 的大作中提到】
: SO, ROW都是什么的缩写？
|
x*****u
发帖数: 776 | 9 Dude, it is called spill over....
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】
: SO= split order
: ROW= rest of world
|
g**********g
发帖数: 18118 | 10 大哥， 您还真认真。
今年这个名词成为历史了。
【在 x*****u 的大作中提到】
: Dude, it is called spill over....
|
|
|
s******t
发帖数: 926 | 11 We do have SO, but already used most if not all of them. It is not history
and we will continue to have SO in the coming years.
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】
: 大哥， 您还真认真。
: 今年这个名词成为历史了。
|
g**********g
发帖数: 18118 | 12 continue to have SO in the coming years.
对于EB-c你那么有信心？
看看如蝗虫般的EB2/3-I
【在 s******t 的大作中提到】
: We do have SO, but already used most if not all of them. It is not history
: and we will continue to have SO in the coming years.
|
s******t
发帖数: 926 | 13 When you talk about SO, why mention EB2/3-I? They don't reduce SO. EB1c-I
will reduce SO, but that's not a real threat, at least for now. I admit it
is somewhat a concern.
According to cnus' magic trackitt sample, EBROW demand is very stable and
this year's sample represents a 4% increase over the last year. It might be
due to popularity of trackitt, instead of real demand increase.
EB3 inventory has reduced by HALF in the last 3 years and will continue to
drop.
People were assuming 70% EB2 PERMs after 07/2007 so EB3 is not a threat in
the future. You cannot have 蝗虫般的 EB3I when you assume 70% of PERM are
EB2, right?
and EB2 demand is already known.
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】
: continue to have SO in the coming years.
: 对于EB-c你那么有信心？
: 看看如蝗虫般的EB2/3-I
|
c*********o
发帖数: 714 | |
a***k
发帖数: 1038 | 15 没有什么对错之说。每年名额就那么多，分到的人就说O是对的，没分到的就怪O。有条
件的还是上eb1才是正道。
【在 c*********o 的大作中提到】
: 谁能和O讲一下不要讲错就错错上加错？
|
g**********g
发帖数: 18118 | 16 看英文真是累呀。
您还真是乐观。
你说SO是按啥分配的？再说了，你没看见烙印走EB1 的爆炸增长？ 你看看这几年SO的
趋势，08-12年，就业是好还是坏？
EBROW经济好的时候是稳步增长的。
be
【在 s******t 的大作中提到】
: When you talk about SO, why mention EB2/3-I? They don't reduce SO. EB1c-I
: will reduce SO, but that's not a real threat, at least for now. I admit it
: is somewhat a concern.
: According to cnus' magic trackitt sample, EBROW demand is very stable and
: this year's sample represents a 4% increase over the last year. It might be
: due to popularity of trackitt, instead of real demand increase.
: EB3 inventory has reduced by HALF in the last 3 years and will continue to
: drop.
: People were assuming 70% EB2 PERMs after 07/2007 so EB3 is not a threat in
: the future. You cannot have 蝗虫般的 EB3I when you assume 70% of PERM are
|
c*********o
发帖数: 714 | 17 对错是针对分配的方式，具体的操作，没有好坏？好吧，有条件的还是上EB5才是正道。
【在 a***k 的大作中提到】
: 没有什么对错之说。每年名额就那么多，分到的人就说O是对的，没分到的就怪O。有条
: 件的还是上eb1才是正道。
|
s******t
发帖数: 926 | 18 咱们讨论的不是一回事，我是说有SO，你是说中国人能不能拿到SO，当然，SO是烙印先
吃，如果剩点汤，老中能喝上几口，不过看上去以后连汤都喝不着了
但是，既然中印捆绑，那谁拿SO都是减少inventory，都是好事，有些人拼命叫嚣以后
一个SO都没有，显然是过分悲观了。要知道以前SO少，是因为vertical spill造成的。
【在 g**********g 的大作中提到】
: 看英文真是累呀。
: 您还真是乐观。
: 你说SO是按啥分配的？再说了，你没看见烙印走EB1 的爆炸增长？ 你看看这几年SO的
: 趋势，08-12年，就业是好还是坏？
: EBROW经济好的时候是稳步增长的。
:
: be
|
