N*****5
发帖数: 502 | 1 从律师那里得到.律师说这个也适用于TSC.
NSC Practice Pointer: Premium Processing for Subsequent I-140s
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 14040242 (posted Apr. 2, 2014)"
During the March 13, 2014 Business Product Line stakeholder teleconference,
the Nebraska Service Center (NSC) clarified that attorneys may request
Premium Processing for a subsequent I-140 filing where the necessary
original Form ETA-9089 labor certification or a certified duplicate labor
certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is currently located
at NSC. NSC reminds practitioners to answer “Yes” to Question 7 in Part 4
of Form I-140, which asks whether the petition is being filed without an
original labor certification because the original was submitted with a
previous I-140. NSC further recommends attaching an addendum that explains
the original labor certification was submitted with a previous I-140 and
includes the receipt number for the previously submitted I-140. Do not
answer “Yes” to Question 8 in Part 4 of Form I-140 because this will
indicate to NSC that a duplicate labor certification is needed and will
preclude Premium Processing.
NSC also confirmed that a Premium Processing request will be denied if the A
file containing the original certified labor certification is not located
at NSC, unless the file is already in transit to NSC. When NSC receives an I
-140 petition, it generally requests the A file. Thus, while the original
labor certification may not initially be located at the NSC, it may be
received at NSC later, at which time a Premium Processing application could
be accepted. Attorneys can try contacting USCIS National Customer Service
Center (NCSC) to determine where the A file is located, or, in the
alternative, try filing the I-907 Request for Premium Processing to see if
USCIS will accept it. If the I-907 is rejected, attorneys are not precluded
from filing another I-907 in the future. | F*********u
发帖数: 12190 | 2 说A file不在NSC会拒绝pp，除非A file已经在运往NSC的路上了
这个是说被拒绝的就会一直被拒，除非已经开始审理你的case调了A-file
这时候虽然pp会成功但也属于浪费钱是么？
,
4
【在 N*****5 的大作中提到】
: 从律师那里得到.律师说这个也适用于TSC.
: NSC Practice Pointer: Premium Processing for Subsequent I-140s
: Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 14040242 (posted Apr. 2, 2014)"
: During the March 13, 2014 Business Product Line stakeholder teleconference,
: the Nebraska Service Center (NSC) clarified that attorneys may request
: Premium Processing for a subsequent I-140 filing where the necessary
: original Form ETA-9089 labor certification or a certified duplicate labor
: certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is currently located
: at NSC. NSC reminds practitioners to answer “Yes” to Question 7 in Part 4
: of Form I-140, which asks whether the petition is being filed without an
| l*******n
发帖数: 8388 | 3 不算。人家又不保证A file到了NSC就看。
只有PP才能保证。
【在 F*********u 的大作中提到】
: 说A file不在NSC会拒绝pp，除非A file已经在运往NSC的路上了
: 这个是说被拒绝的就会一直被拒，除非已经开始审理你的case调了A-file
: 这时候虽然pp会成功但也属于浪费钱是么？
:
: ,
: 4
| G**********n
发帖数: 93 | 4 看糊涂了 既然官方都允许了 为什么最后PP成功的还是很少数呢
【在 F*********u 的大作中提到】
: 说A file不在NSC会拒绝pp，除非A file已经在运往NSC的路上了
: 这个是说被拒绝的就会一直被拒，除非已经开始审理你的case调了A-file
: 这时候虽然pp会成功但也属于浪费钱是么？
:
: ,
: 4
| a*****a
发帖数: 429 | 5 每个律师都会收到这么个东东吗？如果是那就可以要求律师pp了吧
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
【在 N*****5 的大作中提到】
: 从律师那里得到.律师说这个也适用于TSC.
: NSC Practice Pointer: Premium Processing for Subsequent I-140s
: Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 14040242 (posted Apr. 2, 2014)"
: During the March 13, 2014 Business Product Line stakeholder teleconference,
: the Nebraska Service Center (NSC) clarified that attorneys may request
: Premium Processing for a subsequent I-140 filing where the necessary
: original Form ETA-9089 labor certification or a certified duplicate labor
: certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is currently located
: at NSC. NSC reminds practitioners to answer “Yes” to Question 7 in Part 4
: of Form I-140, which asks whether the petition is being filed without an
| n*****a
发帖数: 447 | |
|
