s****y
发帖数: 478 | 1 买了Pioneer VSX 521-K receiver，不知道配什么音箱，主要用来看电视，预算$200以
内。
另外，有用过这个receiver的吗？不知道好不好，前些天newegg有deal,就跳了这个，
要是不好，我就退了算了，还省的找音箱了。谢谢。 | N9
发帖数: 92 | 2 It is an entry level receiver from Pioneer. For TV, I think it is enough.
For TV, cheap speaker set is enought as well - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882290146
S129, Piano black, small profile, sounds ok. If you want a little bigger
speakers, Sony B1000 is enough; even bigger, Sony B3000. Then get a cheap
subwoofer from amazon or newegg: polk, sherwood or dayton. For TV, no need
for fancy stuff. :-) | s****y
发帖数: 478 | 3 Thank you so much for your detailed information
【在 N9 的大作中提到】
: It is an entry level receiver from Pioneer. For TV, I think it is enough.
: For TV, cheap speaker set is enought as well - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882290146
: S129, Piano black, small profile, sounds ok. If you want a little bigger
: speakers, Sony B1000 is enough; even bigger, Sony B3000. Then get a cheap
: subwoofer from amazon or newegg: polk, sherwood or dayton. For TV, no need
: for fancy stuff. :-)
| h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 4 买一对polk的书架箱, 选一对在你的预算之内的. | h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 5 BTW, 今天 Polk monitor 40在newegg上deal不错
【在 s****y 的大作中提到】
: 买了Pioneer VSX 521-K receiver，不知道配什么音箱，主要用来看电视，预算$200以
: 内。
: 另外，有用过这个receiver的吗？不知道好不好，前些天newegg有deal,就跳了这个，
: 要是不好，我就退了算了，还省的找音箱了。谢谢。
| s****y
发帖数: 478 | 6 Thanks for the suggestion. how is this one compared to Sony B3000?
B3000 is cheaper than Polk 40. Thanks again.
【在 h********n 的大作中提到】
: BTW, 今天 Polk monitor 40在newegg上deal不错
| N9
发帖数: 92 | 7 http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=20194886
Also, I would say it is related to your space as well. For sure, those M70s
are much better than M40 and S3000. | s****y
发帖数: 478 | 8 Thank you very much for giving me the useful link. If in the future I want
to upgrade to 5.1 home theater system, can either B3000 or 40s serve as a
surround sound speaker or back speaker? thanks again.
M70s
【在 N9 的大作中提到】
: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=20194886
: Also, I would say it is related to your space as well. For sure, those M70s
: are much better than M40 and S3000.
| N9
发帖数: 92 | 9 That is for sure if you are not too critical. :-) Audiophile people usually
emphasize Timber-match though.
5.1 is more fun to me than 2.1 or 2.0 while watching movies. I didn't spend
much money on speakers but from what i have, i do like 3-way speaker more
than the 2-way. However, it is said that high-end good bookshelf 2-way
speakers are very very good -- but that comes with a great bill too. It
space and money allows, I do suggest to go with bigger speakers such as M70s
as they do sound fuller than bookshelf speakers. | i*d
发帖数: 2640 | 10 http://www.tsto.com/SearchResults.asp?mfg=Wharfedale
【在 s****y 的大作中提到】
: 买了Pioneer VSX 521-K receiver，不知道配什么音箱，主要用来看电视，预算$200以
: 内。
: 另外，有用过这个receiver的吗？不知道好不好，前些天newegg有deal,就跳了这个，
: 要是不好，我就退了算了，还省的找音箱了。谢谢。
| h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 11 我觉得吧, 小房间上monitor 40应该够了, Monitor 70就是多了两个woofer.
即使你用5.1的系统, 两个front值得买稍好一点的. 如果你还唱歌, 我倒是建议用2.1
的系统唱. 我用yamaha a700的receiver, 解码的结果是, 唱歌的时候如果5.1 ch, 声
音都在中置音箱; 用2.1就比较爽.
usually
spend
M70s
【在 N9 的大作中提到】
: That is for sure if you are not too critical. :-) Audiophile people usually
: emphasize Timber-match though.
: 5.1 is more fun to me than 2.1 or 2.0 while watching movies. I didn't spend
: much money on speakers but from what i have, i do like 3-way speaker more
: than the 2-way. However, it is said that high-end good bookshelf 2-way
: speakers are very very good -- but that comes with a great bill too. It
: space and money allows, I do suggest to go with bigger speakers such as M70s
: as they do sound fuller than bookshelf speakers.
| h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 12 update一下, 我买了一对polk monitor 40, 再加一个T-amp, 就这个价钱来说, 音质不
错. 这对M40主要是给LD听音乐的, 我自己的系统在地下室.
我不太喜欢sony的音箱, 试听过两个落地的(忘了啥型号), 声音没有层次, 混在一起(
LD的评价).
【在 s****y 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for the suggestion. how is this one compared to Sony B3000?
: B3000 is cheaper than Polk 40. Thanks again.
|
|
