l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 1 上学期间生大女儿的时候用了WIC, 正在纠结是填yes 还是No 中，考古了下，看到皮匠
说写No也无所谓，就是想问问有否和我情况类似的先辈写no, 然后也没有影响身份调整
的情况。在线等！！ | l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 2 自己顶一个
【在 l**********e 的大作中提到】
: 上学期间生大女儿的时候用了WIC, 正在纠结是填yes 还是No 中，考古了下，看到皮匠
: 说写No也无所谓，就是想问问有否和我情况类似的先辈写no, 然后也没有影响身份调整
: 的情况。在线等！！
| f**********r
发帖数: 2027 | 3 网上的意见是No.
【在 l**********e 的大作中提到】
: 上学期间生大女儿的时候用了WIC, 正在纠结是填yes 还是No 中，考古了下，看到皮匠
: 说写No也无所谓，就是想问问有否和我情况类似的先辈写no, 然后也没有影响身份调整
: 的情况。在线等！！
| l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 4 多谢你的回复，你和我的情况一样吗？
【在 f**********r 的大作中提到】
: 网上的意见是No.
| l**********e
发帖数: 467 | | d*******n
发帖数: 1339 | 6 I know WIC/Medcaid are not suppose to release any personal information to
immigration office
I wonder anyone has personal experience though
【在 f**********r 的大作中提到】
: 网上的意见是No.
| f**********r
发帖数: 2027 | 7 :我没用过WIC，不过在版上看好多人讨论过这个问题。一致的意见是NO。
【在 l**********e 的大作中提到】
: 多谢你的回复，你和我的情况一样吗？
| l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 8 谢谢 dragon and flyingbirder 的热心回复，我比较确定的是WIC 和Medicaid USCIS
官方声明这个不是public charge, 就是不知道写no 是不意味着自己明知不报的情况
。不太确定。 | z****y
发帖数: 6864 | | l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 10 你是说俩个都属于No 的回答对吗？请问您当时也是这个情况吗？
【在 z****y 的大作中提到】
: 不是，不是
| | | z****y
发帖数: 6864 | 11 是属于No
网上很多说明
【在 l**********e 的大作中提到】
: 你是说俩个都属于No 的回答对吗？请问您当时也是这个情况吗？
| l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 12 太感谢了。
【在 z****y 的大作中提到】
: 是属于No
: 网上很多说明
| M*******X
发帖数: 28 | 13 WIC和Medicaid显然属于public assistant,但不属于public charge。所以，照实填写
不会影响申请。 | l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 14 thank you, got you.
【在 M*******X 的大作中提到】
: WIC和Medicaid显然属于public assistant,但不属于public charge。所以，照实填写
: 不会影响申请。
| b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | | g******1
发帖数: 1303 | | x****a
发帖数: 1041 | 17 WIC和Medicaid算是给美国公民小孩的吧。不是大人的福利。 | d*******n
发帖数: 1339 | 18 大人也给一段时间
【在 x****a 的大作中提到】
: WIC和Medicaid算是给美国公民小孩的吧。不是大人的福利。
| l**********e
发帖数: 467 | 19 当时我妻子从怀孕到生我女儿就用了medicaid 和WIC,现在就纠结在这段时间，出生后
一个月就好像被停掉了。小孩生下来就也有这些福利了，但小孩的这些福利我觉得应该
和父母没多大关系，因为她们是受益人，所以我不担心，我已经去USCIS官网上找的
medicaid and wic 明确不属于public charge 范畴，所以决定回答yes,然后附一张纸
解释。下面是USCIS的说明：
What publicly funded benefits may not be considered for public charge
purposes?
A. Non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care)
are generally not taken into account for purposes of a public charge
determination.
Special-purpose cash assistance is also generally not taken into account for
purposes of public charge determination.
Non-cash or special-purpose cash benefits are generally supplemental in
nature and do not make a person primarily dependent on the government for
subsistence. Therefore, past, current, or future receipt of these benefits
do not impact a public charge determination. Non-cash or special purpose
cash benefits that are not considered for public charge purposes include:
Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including
public assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of
symptoms of communicable diseases; use of health clinics, short-term
rehabilitation services, and emergency medical services) other than support
for long-term institutional care
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
Nutrition programs, including Food Stamps, the Special Supplemental
Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School
Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency
food assistance programs
Housing benefits
Child care services
Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program
(LIHEAP)
Emergency disaster relief
Foster care and adoption assistance
Educational assistance (such as attending public school), including
benefits under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary, or
higher education
Job training programs
In-kind, community-based programs, services, or assistance (such as soup
kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)
State and local programs that are similar to the federal programs listed
above are also generally not considered for public charge purposes. Please
be aware that states may adopt different names for the same or similar
publicly funded programs. It is the underlying nature of the program, not
the name adopted in a particular state, which determines whether or not it
should be considered for public charge purposes. In California, for example
, Medicaid is called "Medi-Cal" and CHIP is called "Healthy Families."
These benefits are not considered for public charge purposes.
In addition, and consistent with existing practice, cash payments that have
been earned, such as Title II Social Security benefits, government pensions,
and veterans' benefits, among other forms of earned benefits, do not
support a public charge determination. Unemployment compensation is also not
considered for public charge purposes.
发到这里希望对以后类似情况的父母AOS有用。所以现在我也深刻地理解了皮匠当时所
说的“无所谓”一词用意。
【在 x****a 的大作中提到】
: WIC和Medicaid算是给美国公民小孩的吧。不是大人的福利。
|
|
