r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression
The Convention for the Definition of Aggression[edit]
Two Conventions for the Definition of Aggression were signed in London on 3
and 4 July 1933. The first was signed by Czechoslovakia, Romania, the Soviet
Union, Turkey and Yugoslavia, and came into effect on 17 February 1934,
when it was ratified by all of them but Turkey. The second was signed by
Afghanistan (ratified 20 October 1933), Estonia (4 December), Latvia (4
December), Persia (16 November), Poland (16 October), Romania (16 October),
the Soviet Union (16 October) and Turkey, which ratified both treaties on 23
March 1934. Finland acceded to the second convention on 31 January 1934.
The second convention was the first to be registered with the League of
Nations Treaty Series on 29 March 1934, while the first was registered on 26
April. As Lithuania refused to sign any treaty including Poland,[4] she
signed the definition of aggression in a separate pact with the Soviet Union
on 5 July 1933, also in London, and exchanged ratifications on 14 December.
It was registered in the Treaty Series on 16 April 1934.
The signatories of both treaties were also signatories of the Kellogg–
Briand Pact prohibiting aggression, and were seeking an agreed definition of
the latter. Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia were members of the
Little Entente, and their signatures alarmed Bulgaria, since the definition
of aggression clearly covered its support of the Internal Macedonian
Revolutionary Organization.[5] Both treaties base their definition on the "
Politis Report" of the Committee of Security Questions made 24 March 1933 to
the Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments, in answer to
a proposal of the Soviet delegation. The Greek politician Nikolaos Politis
was behind the inclusion of "support for armed bands" as a form of
aggression.[6] Ratifications for both treaties were deposited in Moscow, as
the convention was primarily the work of Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet
signatory.[7] The convention defined an act of aggression as follows:
Declaration of war upon another State.
Invasion by its armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the
territory of another State.
Attack by its land, naval or air forces, with or without a declaration of
war, on the territory, vessels or aircraft of another State.
Naval blockade of the coasts or ports of another State.
Provision of support to armed bands formed in its territory which have
invaded the territory of another State, or refusal, notwithstanding the
request of the invaded State, to take, in its own territory, all the
measures in its power to deprive those bands of all assistance or protection.
The League prerogative under that convention to expel a League member found
guilty of aggression was used by the League Assembly only once, against the
Soviet government itself, on December 14, 1939, following the Soviet
invasion of Finland.[8][9]
Primary documents Text of the Convention of 3 July
Text of the Convention of 4 July
Text of the Convention of 5 July
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression | r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | | s**********0
发帖数: 1128 | 3 又在深情的呼唤，啊，呼唤，啊呼唤，我的。。。
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: 请黄俄教授正面回答。
| f*******e
发帖数: 1061 | 4 There is also a word called "anti-aggression"
3
Soviet
,
23
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression
: The Convention for the Definition of Aggression[edit]
: Two Conventions for the Definition of Aggression were signed in London on 3
: and 4 July 1933. The first was signed by Czechoslovakia, Romania, the Soviet
: Union, Turkey and Yugoslavia, and came into effect on 17 February 1934,
: when it was ratified by all of them but Turkey. The second was signed by
: Afghanistan (ratified 20 October 1933), Estonia (4 December), Latvia (4
: December), Persia (16 November), Poland (16 October), Romania (16 October),
: the Soviet Union (16 October) and Turkey, which ratified both treaties on 23
: March 1934. Finland acceded to the second convention on 31 January 1934.
| P******0
发帖数: 9787 | 5 没见过你这么无聊的搅屎棍
3
Soviet
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression
: The Convention for the Definition of Aggression[edit]
: Two Conventions for the Definition of Aggression were signed in London on 3
: and 4 July 1933. The first was signed by Czechoslovakia, Romania, the Soviet
: Union, Turkey and Yugoslavia, and came into effect on 17 February 1934,
: when it was ratified by all of them but Turkey. The second was signed by
: Afghanistan (ratified 20 October 1933), Estonia (4 December), Latvia (4
: December), Persia (16 November), Poland (16 October), Romania (16 October),
: the Soviet Union (16 October) and Turkey, which ratified both treaties on 23
: March 1934. Finland acceded to the second convention on 31 January 1934.
| s**********e
发帖数: 33562 | 6 好啊。德国没有进攻过中国本土，中国先对德国宣战。按照这个标准，是中国侵略德国
罗？呵呵。同样的，按照这个定义，二战是英国法国澳大利亚新西兰联合侵略了德国；
而苏联则发动了对日本的侵略战争。可是为啥没有人（除掉德国人和日本狗外）谴责英
国法国澳大利亚新西兰联合侵略德国而苏联侵略日本？
事实上，苏联的确是吃过这个定义的亏，丫在苏芬战争里面被应用了这个定义被判定成
侵略，然后被赶出了国联（这一次不折不扣是侵略战争）。但是波兰这一次，没有。 | r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | 7 这个定义是你的毛子爸爸在1933年提出的，当时并没有被国际社会普遍接受，中美英法
德日等国家都没有签字。但是你的毛子爸爸和波兰是签字认可了的。所以请问，你毛子
爸爸在1939年进攻波兰是否符合你毛子爸爸自己之前提出的侵略定义？什么叫搬起石头
砸自己的脚自打耳光，就是你毛子爸爸和你这样的黄俄孝子贤孙不断现实上演的一幕一
幕。
为何苏联在苏芬战争进攻芬兰是不折不扣的侵略？进攻波兰就不是？波兰和芬兰的区别
在哪里？
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 好啊。德国没有进攻过中国本土，中国先对德国宣战。按照这个标准，是中国侵略德国
: 罗？呵呵。同样的，按照这个定义，二战是英国法国澳大利亚新西兰联合侵略了德国；
: 而苏联则发动了对日本的侵略战争。可是为啥没有人（除掉德国人和日本狗外）谴责英
: 国法国澳大利亚新西兰联合侵略德国而苏联侵略日本？
: 事实上，苏联的确是吃过这个定义的亏，丫在苏芬战争里面被应用了这个定义被判定成
: 侵略，然后被赶出了国联（这一次不折不扣是侵略战争）。但是波兰这一次，没有。
| r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | 8 黄俄叫兽搬起石头砸自己的脚。为毛子爸爸的侵略行径辩护结果被毛子爸爸自己提出的
侵略定义打脸。
【在 P******0 的大作中提到】
: 没见过你这么无聊的搅屎棍
:
: 3
: Soviet
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
| s**********e
发帖数: 33562 | 9 呵呵，啥时候李将军又对苏联的标准奉若神明了？对苏联是一个标准，对英美又是一套
标准？莫非是当年强大的苏联红军把你日本关东军祖宗打得屁滚尿流让你流落中国至今
？哈哈！
芬兰当然不一样，他们是自治大公国，有相当的独立性，跟西乌克兰西白俄罗斯不一样
。所以苏芬战争的时候苏联没有说那是他们的土地，但是苏联对于进入波兰就认为是拿
回自己的土地。接下来李将军是不是要通过各种造谣的手段拼命论证芬兰的确是沙俄长
期直接统治的土地？呵呵。
说了半天，将军还是解释一下英法侵略德国的问题吧。哈哈。
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】
: 这个定义是你的毛子爸爸在1933年提出的，当时并没有被国际社会普遍接受，中美英法
: 德日等国家都没有签字。但是你的毛子爸爸和波兰是签字认可了的。所以请问，你毛子
: 爸爸在1939年进攻波兰是否符合你毛子爸爸自己之前提出的侵略定义？什么叫搬起石头
: 砸自己的脚自打耳光，就是你毛子爸爸和你这样的黄俄孝子贤孙不断现实上演的一幕一
: 幕。
: 为何苏联在苏芬战争进攻芬兰是不折不扣的侵略？进攻波兰就不是？波兰和芬兰的区别
: 在哪里？
| r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | 10 芬兰大公国的国旗是什么？国家元首是谁？芬兰大公国无非是苏联时期的加盟共和国或
者今天香港特别行政区的地位而已，都是沙俄领土一部分。跟西白俄罗斯西乌克兰有什
么区别？西白俄罗斯西乌克兰还不是在白俄罗斯和乌克兰版图里，又不是俄罗斯自己直
接的版图。
包括芬兰的沙俄领土地图：
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Russian_Empire_(orthographic_
我没有对苏联标准奉若神明。但是苏联自己总得对自己提出的侵略定义负责吧？请问教
授，苏联1939年进攻波兰的行为是否符合苏联自己在1933年提出的侵略定义？
英法是援引和波兰的同盟条约，因为德国侵略波兰在先。况且英法德都不承认苏联的那个
侵略定义。请问波兰在1939年侵略了苏联吗？苏联进攻波兰不是侵略是什么？
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，啥时候李将军又对苏联的标准奉若神明了？对苏联是一个标准，对英美又是一套
: 标准？莫非是当年强大的苏联红军把你日本关东军祖宗打得屁滚尿流让你流落中国至今
: ？哈哈！
: 芬兰当然不一样，他们是自治大公国，有相当的独立性，跟西乌克兰西白俄罗斯不一样
: 。所以苏芬战争的时候苏联没有说那是他们的土地，但是苏联对于进入波兰就认为是拿
: 回自己的土地。接下来李将军是不是要通过各种造谣的手段拼命论证芬兰的确是沙俄长
: 期直接统治的土地？呵呵。
: 说了半天，将军还是解释一下英法侵略德国的问题吧。哈哈。
| r*****y
发帖数: 53800 | 11 二战是日德首先侵略别国，中英等作为盟国一起反侵略而已。请问1939年的波兰侵略了
谁？苏联和德国一起瓜分波兰，如果德国是侵略者，苏联作为德国这个侵略者的同伙，
自然也是侵略者。
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 好啊。德国没有进攻过中国本土，中国先对德国宣战。按照这个标准，是中国侵略德国
: 罗？呵呵。同样的，按照这个定义，二战是英国法国澳大利亚新西兰联合侵略了德国；
: 而苏联则发动了对日本的侵略战争。可是为啥没有人（除掉德国人和日本狗外）谴责英
: 国法国澳大利亚新西兰联合侵略德国而苏联侵略日本？
: 事实上，苏联的确是吃过这个定义的亏，丫在苏芬战争里面被应用了这个定义被判定成
: 侵略，然后被赶出了国联（这一次不折不扣是侵略战争）。但是波兰这一次，没有。
|
|
