M***y
发帖数: 2252 | |
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | |
o****3
发帖数: 5100 | 3 because big 10's btn was not beneficial to ESPN.
now espn signed a huge contract with sec, they need to advocate their
product.
Even I think bama is clearly the 2nd best team, as everybody THINKS,
everything can happen on the field. |
s********d
发帖数: 364 | 4 像今天kirk herby说的，06年的hype然后双双惨败很伤bigt的声誉。
要真实当年umich去了，bigt今年的计算机排名就不会比big12吃亏这么多了。
不过我的疑问是big12是如何骗过计算机超越sec的？
【在 o****3 的大作中提到】
: because big 10's btn was not beneficial to ESPN.
: now espn signed a huge contract with sec, they need to advocate their
: product.
: Even I think bama is clearly the 2nd best team, as everybody THINKS,
: everything can happen on the field.
|
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 5 主要是比分太高了。如果是９：６估计就ｒｅｍａｔｃｈ了。结果４１：３９，全国人
民都发现两个烂队
【在 M***y 的大作中提到】
: 不公平阿
|
S**********e
发帖数: 852 | 6 计算机排名和之前比赛无关吧
big 12 occ战绩好，自然计算机排名高
【在 s********d 的大作中提到】
: 像今天kirk herby说的，06年的hype然后双双惨败很伤bigt的声誉。
: 要真实当年umich去了，bigt今年的计算机排名就不会比big12吃亏这么多了。
: 不过我的疑问是big12是如何骗过计算机超越sec的？
|
t**y
发帖数: 310 | 7 主要是B10比赛结束的早
【在 g*********d 的大作中提到】
: 主要是比分太高了。如果是９：６估计就ｒｅｍａｔｃｈ了。结果４１：３９，全国人
: 民都发现两个烂队
|
o****3
发帖数: 5100 | 8 这个稍微做点调查研究就知道了，可惜还是一大堆人问。
ooc好，打bcs球队多自然排名就高，计算机是不知道sec连赢5年冠军的。
【在 S**********e 的大作中提到】
: 计算机排名和之前比赛无关吧
: big 12 occ战绩好，自然计算机排名高
|
s********d
发帖数: 364 | 9 只看当年的吗？
【在 S**********e 的大作中提到】
: 计算机排名和之前比赛无关吧
: big 12 occ战绩好，自然计算机排名高
|
S******a
发帖数: 1644 | 10 Because neither OSU nor UM defeated top ranked teams from other conferences
that year. |
|
|
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 11 that's not the reason.
conferences
【在 S******a 的大作中提到】
: Because neither OSU nor UM defeated top ranked teams from other conferences
: that year.
|
S**********e
发帖数: 852 | 12 只看当年，只看胜负，不看margin
【在 s********d 的大作中提到】
: 只看当年的吗？
|
S******a
发帖数: 1644 | 13 Why?
【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: that's not the reason.
:
: conferences
|
s*******a
发帖数: 705 | 14 texas does not count?
conferences
【在 S******a 的大作中提到】
: Because neither OSU nor UM defeated top ranked teams from other conferences
: that year.
|
B******m
发帖数: 2643 | 15 06年第二周OSU客场打败Texas，是当时的第一对第二
Michigan干掉了ND，ND是当时的第二，这些看起来是很给力的。
而且那一年Boise State全胜，要现在这个debate就大了。
conferences
【在 S******a 的大作中提到】
: Because neither OSU nor UM defeated top ranked teams from other conferences
: that year.
|
S******a
发帖数: 1644 | 16 Texas did not even enter into a BCS bowl game that year. Its ranking in the last week, instead of the ranking in the second week, would be considered in the final computer calculation.
【在 s*******a 的大作中提到】
: texas does not count?
:
: conferences
|
d********g
发帖数: 11948 | 17
the last week, instead of the ranking in the second week, would be
considered in the final computer calculation.
tell me a team that Bama beat this year that will go to a BCS bowl. Non! I
still believe if Michigan went on to take Florida, and we went to Rose Bowl,
the results would be different. Michigan somehow has a key to beat SEC when
they are normal (count out RR era)
【在 S******a 的大作中提到】
: Texas did not even enter into a BCS bowl game that year. Its ranking in the last week, instead of the ranking in the second week, would be considered in the final computer calculation.
|
w*****2
发帖数: 1458 | 18 请列一下big12赢了那些OOC games好吗？
不见得比SEC更impressed吧
【在 o****3 的大作中提到】
: 这个稍微做点调查研究就知道了，可惜还是一大堆人问。
: ooc好，打bcs球队多自然排名就高，计算机是不知道sec连赢5年冠军的。
|
l*****8
发帖数: 16949 | 19 有的计算机排名肯定是看前一年的，至少Sagarin是。你在每一个赛季初看一下就知道
了。不看前一年排名的话，打完一场比赛,赢得全在前120名，输的全在120名之后？只
不过越往后，前一年排名的影响越小罢了。 |
c**********o
发帖数: 1941 | 20 被人类强行更正了
【在 M***y 的大作中提到】
: 不公平阿
|
m****u
发帖数: 3915 | |
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 22 LOL, `if' king.
Bowl,
when
【在 d********g 的大作中提到】
:
: the last week, instead of the ranking in the second week, would be
: considered in the final computer calculation.
: tell me a team that Bama beat this year that will go to a BCS bowl. Non! I
: still believe if Michigan went on to take Florida, and we went to Rose Bowl,
: the results would be different. Michigan somehow has a key to beat SEC when
: they are normal (count out RR era)
|
