f******n
发帖数: 72 | 1 坏消息呀～
Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
journals.
PRL might become insuffic | f******n
发帖数: 72 | | t*****e
发帖数: 10 | 3 you can graduate with PHD when PRL, so my PHD more impossible | x******i
发帖数: 3022 | 4 simple. just change "PRL" into "Nature PRL".
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
| m**********e
发帖数: 12525 | 5 晚了,这个stereotype早已形成,PRL即使挥刀自宫把自己的文章数量减少到5%
也没戏了
PRL地位下降其实并不是因为所谓发表容易造成的,而是因为这世界变了,以前
自从欧洲人的elsewhere的一些牛b期刊完蛋后PRL一家独大,现在不行了,竞争
对手太多了
Physics and | v******e
发帖数: 1715 | 6 今后海龟的教授要求会不会改成：
2009年后PRL不低于X篇（或2009年前PRL不低于2X篇）......
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
| x******i
发帖数: 3022 | 7
it'll simply drive everyone to submit to nature physics directly.
【在 m**********e 的大作中提到】
: 晚了,这个stereotype早已形成,PRL即使挥刀自宫把自己的文章数量减少到5%
: 也没戏了
: PRL地位下降其实并不是因为所谓发表容易造成的,而是因为这世界变了,以前
: 自从欧洲人的elsewhere的一些牛b期刊完蛋后PRL一家独大,现在不行了,竞争
: 对手太多了
:
: Physics and
| w********h
发帖数: 12367 | 8 赫赫，早该如此了。
我老如今已经不看PRL了，
只记得当年看过的PRL，无一没有问题。
某些PRL，也不知道fight了多长时间又加上和编辑有点关系才发的。
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
| c*********s
发帖数: 1 | | s***e
发帖数: 7166 | 10 the problem of NP is, not so many people have access to read it.
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】
:
: it'll simply drive everyone to submit to nature physics directly.
| | | d****i
发帖数: 123 | 11 Seems PRL already started to reduce its size from 80 papers weekly (before
Feb 2009) to around 72. | k****s
发帖数: 162 | 12 kao，absolutely bad news~~
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
| f******h
发帖数: 609 | | f******h
发帖数: 609 | 14 Anyone know when was this letter sent out?
This week?
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
| x*******n
发帖数: 185 | 15 挺好，投nature physics去
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
| h******c
发帖数: 2111 | 16 没发过PRL的飘过～
【在 f******n 的大作中提到】
: 坏消息呀～
: Dear Divisional Associate Editor,
: For some time now the readers and Editors of PRL have concluded that it
: publishes too many manuscripts. As you may know from the discussions at
: our DAE dinner meetings at the March, April and other APS meetings, the
: DAEs also largely share this view. The reasons are the following:
: 1) PRL is in danger of seeing the best new research results going to
: Nature, Science, and in recent months, Nature Physics, and other Nature
: journals.
: PRL might become insuffic
|
|
