b******r
发帖数: 16603 | |
b******r
发帖数: 16603 | |
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | |
m*********n
发帖数: 6098 | 4 小聲問一名, 母雞是啥意思?
【在 b******r 的大作中提到】
: 大牛们，给指点下。。。母鸡中。。。
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 5
【在 b******r 的大作中提到】
: 大牛们，给指点下。。。母鸡中。。。
|
b******r
发帖数: 16603 | 6 汗一个，也许是奥教主明天的保密工作做的好，大MM们也是搞点defensive driving?
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: 早说呀，明天惨了惨了。。。。。
|
b******r
发帖数: 16603 | 7 看对比图似乎就是要大动作，正相关还是反相关倒也不一定。。。MS还是反的多。。
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
|
b******r
发帖数: 16603 | 8 就是不懂。。
【在 m*********n 的大作中提到】
: 小聲問一名, 母雞是啥意思?
|
v****e
发帖数: 19471 | 9 it's generally accepted as a contrarian indicator.
【在 b******r 的大作中提到】
: 大牛们，给指点下。。。母鸡中。。。
|
g*****7
发帖数: 324 | 10 你最近说话比较准，是吗？
【在 v****e 的大作中提到】
: it's generally accepted as a contrarian indicator.
|
|
|
L****n
发帖数: 12932 | 11
post like this is what make coming to bbs worthwhile.
over the last 2 yrs, $CPCI reach 2.0 six times besides today, EVERY time it
is followed by a dip of SPX 3-5% within 2-3 weeks. it is NOT a contrarian
indicator.
【在 b******r 的大作中提到】
: 大牛们，给指点下。。。母鸡中。。。
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | |
j*****h
发帖数: 3292 | 13 顶
it
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: post like this is what make coming to bbs worthwhile.
: over the last 2 yrs, $CPCI reach 2.0 six times besides today, EVERY time it
: is followed by a dip of SPX 3-5% within 2-3 weeks. it is NOT a contrarian
: indicator.
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 14 that's exactly the definition of contrarian indicator........
it
contrarian
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: post like this is what make coming to bbs worthwhile.
: over the last 2 yrs, $CPCI reach 2.0 six times besides today, EVERY time it
: is followed by a dip of SPX 3-5% within 2-3 weeks. it is NOT a contrarian
: indicator.
|
L****n
发帖数: 12932 | 15
hehe, put volume twice over call volume--people (big money actually) betting
market going down-and then market goes down. where is the contrary?
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: that's exactly the definition of contrarian indicator........
:
: it
: contrarian
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 16 晕，
一个指标下降，一个指标就上升啊。。。
从字面理解，，，
betting
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: hehe, put volume twice over call volume--people (big money actually) betting
: market going down-and then market goes down. where is the contrary?
|
w******s
发帖数: 16209 | 17 你们两个说的都对. 不同层次.
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: 晕，
: 一个指标下降，一个指标就上升啊。。。
: 从字面理解，，，
:
: betting
|
b*****3
发帖数: 288 | 18 奥巴明天肯定要成为大家的骂点！
今天升的这么猛，估计街上肯定有消息。 |
L****n
发帖数: 12932 | 19
it's not hard to find what contrarian indicator means...
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: 晕，
: 一个指标下降，一个指标就上升啊。。。
: 从字面理解，，，
:
: betting
|
h****n
发帖数: 1546 | |
|
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 21 buy faz ？
【在 h****n 的大作中提到】
: 看在这个图的份上,盘后抢了点反指
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 22 of course, I knew what it meant:)
You made several mistakes here, to name a few:
1. index-only p/c is not as predictive as equity-only or combined p/c.
2. it's simply wrong to have static interpretation of p/c ratio.
3. normally, for p/c ratio, peak is a BUY signal.
4. "within 2-3 weeks" is really too long a window, you'd better check
local minimum after the peak? it could be interpreted as it.
Here is the graph, I basically has the opposite conclusion as yours.
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: it's not hard to find what contrarian indicator means...
|
b*****3
发帖数: 288 | 23 不懂装懂，
你指出的完全没有意义。你的结论也不可靠。
摆脱。。不要再半瓶水到处误导大家乐
说啥local min，这个可行度太低了，懂吗，别人早就证明这个没有统计意义。
搂主值得是outlier，就你这水平，回去先学点统计基本知识先。
by the way, we will see your conclusion is correct or not!
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: of course, I knew what it meant:)
: You made several mistakes here, to name a few:
: 1. index-only p/c is not as predictive as equity-only or combined p/c.
: 2. it's simply wrong to have static interpretation of p/c ratio.
: 3. normally, for p/c ratio, peak is a BUY signal.
: 4. "within 2-3 weeks" is really too long a window, you'd better check
: local minimum after the peak? it could be interpreted as it.
: Here is the graph, I basically has the opposite conclusion as yours.
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 24 i vote for mitbbs2020 - green tomorrow. i rather interpret the high ratio as
hedge positions entered today. |
b*****3
发帖数: 288 | 25 你的逻辑我看不懂，
如果大资金要对冲风险，那就是他们觉得仓位有危险，他们信息总是比大家多一点，那
应该跌呀。
总不至于，你认为大量买入对冲风险的是小散户。
as
【在 g******e 的大作中提到】
: i vote for mitbbs2020 - green tomorrow. i rather interpret the high ratio as
: hedge positions entered today.
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 26 I made a test for those interested
Here is the result:
187 local maximum in 2 year, SPX raised the next day in 123 out of them.
SPX
raised 43 out of them within a week and before next peak.
only 21 out of 187 peaks, SPX decreased which turned out to be a bad
"BUY"
signal, nevertheless, at least half of them due to continuous(too close)
maximums.
btw, brandy3, of course, I am not able to predict the market but I knew
you are a loser without prediction.
Date PC SPX Maxima Buy False |
L****n
发帖数: 12932 | 27
well, you can hold your opinion, but, it's quite premature to call other
opinion as "mistake" before you fully understand what they are saying:
1. index-only P/C is exactly what i'm looking at, it's the core of chart
reading: find out what the big money, wise guys, professional money managers
(whatever you want to call them) are doing. Index only P/C mostly used by
professionals to hedge their position. and their action, when out of
ordinary, warrants alert.
2. i'm not aware of anything other t
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: of course, I knew what it meant:)
: You made several mistakes here, to name a few:
: 1. index-only p/c is not as predictive as equity-only or combined p/c.
: 2. it's simply wrong to have static interpretation of p/c ratio.
: 3. normally, for p/c ratio, peak is a BUY signal.
: 4. "within 2-3 weeks" is really too long a window, you'd better check
: local minimum after the peak? it could be interpreted as it.
: Here is the graph, I basically has the opposite conclusion as yours.
|
c*********o
发帖数: 8367 | 28 都是牛人， 都是文青阿。。。。太能写了
managers
have
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: well, you can hold your opinion, but, it's quite premature to call other
: opinion as "mistake" before you fully understand what they are saying:
: 1. index-only P/C is exactly what i'm looking at, it's the core of chart
: reading: find out what the big money, wise guys, professional money managers
: (whatever you want to call them) are doing. Index only P/C mostly used by
: professionals to hedge their position. and their action, when out of
: ordinary, warrants alert.
: 2. i'm not aware of anything other t
|
S******n
发帖数: 1009 | 29 local maximum is useless, please test the outliers say
the ratio is larger than 2
in 123 out of them.
peak.
out to be a bad
continuous(too close)
the market but I knew
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: I made a test for those interested
: Here is the result:
: 187 local maximum in 2 year, SPX raised the next day in 123 out of them.
: SPX
: raised 43 out of them within a week and before next peak.
: only 21 out of 187 peaks, SPX decreased which turned out to be a bad
: "BUY"
: signal, nevertheless, at least half of them due to continuous(too close)
: maximums.
: btw, brandy3, of course, I am not able to predict the market but I knew
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 30 有一个问题/参数，这些187cases，当天涨跌的情况怎么样，会不会fine tune你这个数
据？比如当天跌超过多少的 =》第二天。。。
CPCI高，明天看看open interest怎么样。
我从来搞不懂，这种时候，谁是买家，谁是卖家。尤其很多还是做spread。有什么经验
，想法？
多谢。
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: I made a test for those interested
: Here is the result:
: 187 local maximum in 2 year, SPX raised the next day in 123 out of them.
: SPX
: raised 43 out of them within a week and before next peak.
: only 21 out of 187 peaks, SPX decreased which turned out to be a bad
: "BUY"
: signal, nevertheless, at least half of them due to continuous(too close)
: maximums.
: btw, brandy3, of course, I am not able to predict the market but I knew
|
|
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 31 有一定道理，或者做一个渐进表，比如：
1.1 60%
1.2 65%
。。。
【在 S******n 的大作中提到】
: local maximum is useless, please test the outliers say
: the ratio is larger than 2
:
: in 123 out of them.
: peak.
: out to be a bad
: continuous(too close)
: the market but I knew
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 32 I apologize for the word "mistake". It's very impolite.
You can always find a time window to FIT your interpretation.
Nevertheless, I guess we could never reach the same conclusion with
different time scale.
Index-only WAS good indicator. and the significance varies with time.
High volume Put could have several possible reasons, and they implied
different directions. That's why I said, you need to check the indices
option chain to justify it.
I guess it's hard for us to convince each other, and
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: well, you can hold your opinion, but, it's quite premature to call other
: opinion as "mistake" before you fully understand what they are saying:
: 1. index-only P/C is exactly what i'm looking at, it's the core of chart
: reading: find out what the big money, wise guys, professional money managers
: (whatever you want to call them) are doing. Index only P/C mostly used by
: professionals to hedge their position. and their action, when out of
: ordinary, warrants alert.
: 2. i'm not aware of anything other t
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 33 I disagree.
but here is what you want, for this composite index, there is no value >
2
I used 1.3 threshold which included today(1.33 for today, which is not
that extreme as index-only).
while, 1.3 is about 98% percentile.
there are 15 days out of 624 days with p/c index > 1.3,
exclude today, and those too close(to each other), there are 9 points
observable. 7 out of 9 proved to be good "BUY" signal. raised within 5
days(even raised continuously for days in two cases).
minimum gain is: 1.5%
maxi
【在 S******n 的大作中提到】
: local maximum is useless, please test the outliers say
: the ratio is larger than 2
:
: in 123 out of them.
: peak.
: out to be a bad
: continuous(too close)
: the market but I knew
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 34 Date PC SPX Peak Days to Rally Gain%
3/18/2008 0.99 1330.74
3/19/2008 1.21 1298.42
3/20/2008 1.08 1329.51
3/24/2008 0.81 1349.88
3/25/2008 0.96 1352.99
3/26/2008 1.02 1341.13
3/27/2008 1.13 1325.76
3/28/2008 1.15 1315.22
3/31/2008 1.01 1322.7
4/1/2008 0.89 1370.18
4/2/2008 1.05 1367.53 |
b*****3
发帖数: 288 | 35 仔细看了你的研究，呵呵，你肯定没有博士学位，不知道如何做专业的研究，很不严谨
。是个文科生？你的研究结果没有任何意义。
可以告诉你，有人做过类似的专业研究，local min/max没有统计意义。别浪费时间了
你除了会骂人是loser，和半桶水误导大家外，还会？？？
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: I made a test for those interested
: Here is the result:
: 187 local maximum in 2 year, SPX raised the next day in 123 out of them.
: SPX
: raised 43 out of them within a week and before next peak.
: only 21 out of 187 peaks, SPX decreased which turned out to be a bad
: "BUY"
: signal, nevertheless, at least half of them due to continuous(too close)
: maximums.
: btw, brandy3, of course, I am not able to predict the market but I knew
|
g*******w
发帖数: 430 | 36 人家都不理你了， 还追着人家跑。 大哥， 换个方法吧， lol
【在 b*****3 的大作中提到】
: 仔细看了你的研究，呵呵，你肯定没有博士学位，不知道如何做专业的研究，很不严谨
: 。是个文科生？你的研究结果没有任何意义。
: 可以告诉你，有人做过类似的专业研究，local min/max没有统计意义。别浪费时间了
: 你除了会骂人是loser，和半桶水误导大家外，还会？？？
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 37 nice summary， thanks。
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: I disagree.
: but here is what you want, for this composite index, there is no value >
: 2
: I used 1.3 threshold which included today(1.33 for today, which is not
: that extreme as index-only).
: while, 1.3 is about 98% percentile.
: there are 15 days out of 624 days with p/c index > 1.3,
: exclude today, and those too close(to each other), there are 9 points
: observable. 7 out of 9 proved to be good "BUY" signal. raised within 5
: days(even raised continuously for days in two cases).
|
b*****3
发帖数: 288 | 38 大妈，他的方法是不对，在瞎讲，误导别人，反正马上就可以得到验证的。我看楼主讲
的有理。他就会骂人和庄B
【在 g*******w 的大作中提到】
: 人家都不理你了， 还追着人家跑。 大哥， 换个方法吧， lol
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 39 说说你的理解和source link？我google不到。
【在 b*****3 的大作中提到】
: 大妈，他的方法是不对，在瞎讲，误导别人，反正马上就可以得到验证的。我看楼主讲
: 的有理。他就会骂人和庄B
|
c***m
发帖数: 2630 | 40 I didn't know the put/call ratio was so high today. In my FA, this means
sth bad will happen. It sounds you disagree?
is there a simple explanation for index-only p/c.
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: of course, I knew what it meant:)
: You made several mistakes here, to name a few:
: 1. index-only p/c is not as predictive as equity-only or combined p/c.
: 2. it's simply wrong to have static interpretation of p/c ratio.
: 3. normally, for p/c ratio, peak is a BUY signal.
: 4. "within 2-3 weeks" is really too long a window, you'd better check
: local minimum after the peak? it could be interpreted as it.
: Here is the graph, I basically has the opposite conclusion as yours.
|
|
|
f****z
发帖数: 645 | 41 这么好的贴应该顶一下!
it
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: well, you can hold your opinion, but, it's quite premature to call other
: opinion as "mistake" before you fully understand what they are saying:
: 1. index-only P/C is exactly what i'm looking at, it's the core of chart
: reading: find out what the big money, wise guys, professional money managers
: (whatever you want to call them) are doing. Index only P/C mostly used by
: professionals to hedge their position. and their action, when out of
: ordinary, warrants alert.
: 2. i'm not aware of anything other t
|
b*****3
发帖数: 288 | 42 你google不到是当然的，他用5分钟随便来一下，你觉得他就能找到一个很挣钱的东西
，可能吗？ 有无数人正在研究这个东西。
只有当一些极端的情况和其他条件如市场走势联系起来后，这个才有意义。比如今天，
，，有人感到害怕了。。。
【在 g******e 的大作中提到】
: 说说你的理解和source link？我google不到。
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 43 你手里有没有收藏的文章关于这个的？分享一下？或者存的图？
【在 b*****3 的大作中提到】
: 你google不到是当然的，他用5分钟随便来一下，你觉得他就能找到一个很挣钱的东西
: ，可能吗？ 有无数人正在研究这个东西。
: 只有当一些极端的情况和其他条件如市场走势联系起来后，这个才有意义。比如今天，
: ，，有人感到害怕了。。。
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 44 by blackberry, sorry
【在 g******e 的大作中提到】
: 你手里有没有收藏的文章关于这个的？分享一下？或者存的图？
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 45 Interpreting the Ratios
The concept of interpreting the put-call ratios is an easy one in theory,
but in practice, things become a little more complicated. It is an easy
matter to say that when the ratio gets too high, you should buy the market.
Conversely, if the ratio gets too low, you should take bearish positions.
Quantifying too high and too low is where things get tricky. Past experience
has shown that static interpretation of the put-call ratios is an incorrect
approach, for investors and |
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 46 One other ratio used to be important, but its relevance has
waned in recent years. That is the index put–call ratio, which in theory
is the sum of all index options that trade, but in practice was
mostly just the OEX options, since that index dominated option trading
for years. However, as institutional hedging has become more
and more prevalent, the concept of an index ratio is not as important.
Currently, I prefer to look at weighted ratios on a few specific
indices, but not the sum of all ind
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: well, you can hold your opinion, but, it's quite premature to call other
: opinion as "mistake" before you fully understand what they are saying:
: 1. index-only P/C is exactly what i'm looking at, it's the core of chart
: reading: find out what the big money, wise guys, professional money managers
: (whatever you want to call them) are doing. Index only P/C mostly used by
: professionals to hedge their position. and their action, when out of
: ordinary, warrants alert.
: 2. i'm not aware of anything other t
|
L****n
发帖数: 12932 | 47
谢谢你花了那么多时间， 可惜说不在题上。 上面很多ID都一语说出你的误区， 我就
不再重复了。 书。。。不能读死了。
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: One other ratio used to be important, but its relevance has
: waned in recent years. That is the index put–call ratio, which in theory
: is the sum of all index options that trade, but in practice was
: mostly just the OEX options, since that index dominated option trading
: for years. However, as institutional hedging has become more
: and more prevalent, the concept of an index ratio is not as important.
: Currently, I prefer to look at weighted ratios on a few specific
: indices, but not the sum of all ind
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 48 you made my day~
I thought you were not one of those amateurs.
apparently, I was wrong.
I mock at more books than I appreciate. lol~
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】
:
: 谢谢你花了那么多时间， 可惜说不在题上。 上面很多ID都一语说出你的误区， 我就
: 不再重复了。 书。。。不能读死了。
|
q*********u
发帖数: 9501 | 49 大家讨论的不错，很好！俺很愚钝，看这位mm很有liliwater的风采。 |
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 50 Trading is more art than science, there is no standard or "correct" way.
Whatever makes money and works for you is good. No one is wrong, sounds
better?
Again, I seldom predict market, I always have hedging or trading volatility
mostly. |
|
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 51
===================＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
您真滑稽。 忘了自己刚说过的话了。
发信人: mitbbs2020 (我愿弃世登仙), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 为什么股市里大多数人赚不到钱？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 3 09:55:19 2010, 美东)
你误会了，我是说那种不学习理论知识，从实践中总结经验教训的人傻钱多型送财童子
。以为凭借第六感和运气就可以稳定盈利。
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: Trading is more art than science, there is no standard or "correct" way.
: Whatever makes money and works for you is good. No one is wrong, sounds
: better?
: Again, I seldom predict market, I always have hedging or trading volatility
: mostly.
|
q*********u
发帖数: 9501 | 52 你是不是太picky了，大家的主题是在讨论是否下跌千点。
【在 c******8 的大作中提到】
:
: ===================＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
: 您真滑稽。 忘了自己刚说过的话了。
: 发信人: mitbbs2020 (我愿弃世登仙), 信区: Stock
: 标 题: Re: 为什么股市里大多数人赚不到钱？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 3 09:55:19 2010, 美东)
: 你误会了，我是说那种不学习理论知识，从实践中总结经验教训的人傻钱多型送财童子
: 。以为凭借第六感和运气就可以稳定盈利。
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 53 她最后一个贴，显然是说炒股思路。
和几天前讽刺别人和半个月前质疑别人作假的帖子对比，真滑稽。
再说，我买了正指，大涨对我有好处呀， 我为什么要反对up。
【在 q*********u 的大作中提到】
: 你是不是太picky了，大家的主题是在讨论是否下跌千点。
|
m********0
发帖数: 2717 | 54 我们不是有互不回帖原则么？不是您强烈要求的吗？
我跟你没共同语言，真的。删贴吧。
【在 c******8 的大作中提到】
: 她最后一个贴，显然是说炒股思路。
: 和几天前讽刺别人和半个月前质疑别人作假的帖子对比，真滑稽。
: 再说，我买了正指，大涨对我有好处呀， 我为什么要反对up。
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 55 是啊。
既然你知道规则，昨天为何跟了一屁股zijing的贴呢？
你是不是一天不讽刺人，就浑身不自在呢？
你这张嘴， 现在和屁股已经没区别了。 反正想拉shit随时都可以拉，拉完，象自己刚
才那个贴一样，再吃回去。
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: 我们不是有互不回帖原则么？不是您强烈要求的吗？
: 我跟你没共同语言，真的。删贴吧。
|
M***y
发帖数: 1594 | 56 发信人: cherry88 (cherry), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 明天能涨多少呀？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 7 21:51:09 2010, 美东)
谢谢关心哦。
我long的是faz，
【在 c******8 的大作中提到】
: 是啊。
: 既然你知道规则，昨天为何跟了一屁股zijing的贴呢？
: 你是不是一天不讽刺人，就浑身不自在呢？
: 你这张嘴， 现在和屁股已经没区别了。 反正想拉shit随时都可以拉，拉完，象自己刚
: 才那个贴一样，再吃回去。
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 57 发信人: mitbbs2020 (我愿弃世登仙), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 我支持xiaok1981 (xiaokzhu)和蓉儿。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 7 19:56:24 2010, 美东)
我继续懂你～ 天天拿第一/二性征说事儿，
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
这次您不会找借口了吧。。。。
记住互不侵犯原则，如果你打破了rule，就不要添着一张B脸，再要求别人遵守。
您那套道德指数，历来是束缚别人的，自己这张烂嘴，什么时候都没消停过。
现在别人质疑你了，你又端出一副“大自然多样化”的伪君子形象了。
ps， 我没有”天天“都在拿性征说话， 象您这么“严谨“的学术派，一个单词都要背
书， 说话居然也这么”绝对“ ？ |
M***y
发帖数: 1594 | 58 I am just confused. However, it is true that
我没有义务和你解释我个人的操作模式。
Thanks.
【在 c******8 的大作中提到】
: 发信人: mitbbs2020 (我愿弃世登仙), 信区: Stock
: 标 题: Re: 我支持xiaok1981 (xiaokzhu)和蓉儿。
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 7 19:56:24 2010, 美东)
: 我继续懂你～ 天天拿第一/二性征说事儿，
:
: ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
: 这次您不会找借口了吧。。。。
: 记住互不侵犯原则，如果你打破了rule，就不要添着一张B脸，再要求别人遵守。
: 您那套道德指数，历来是束缚别人的，自己这张烂嘴，什么时候都没消停过。
: 现在别人质疑你了，你又端出一副“大自然多样化”的伪君子形象了。
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 59 既然你是来认真讨论的，我刚才态度不好，sorry！
解释一下：我昨天说的是理论上该涨，但我买跌了。当然我也做了backup的control了
。毕竟市场很狡猾的。
所以你觉得思路矛盾，我没觉得。
【在 M***y 的大作中提到】
: I am just confused. However, it is true that
: 我没有义务和你解释我个人的操作模式。
: Thanks.
|
c******8
发帖数: 3170 | 60 我把我刚才不礼貌的帖子删除了。 上面的跟贴和你解释过了。
【在 M***y 的大作中提到】
: I am just confused. However, it is true that
: 我没有义务和你解释我个人的操作模式。
: Thanks.
|
|
|
q*********u
发帖数: 9501 | 61 昨天理论上应该上涨？
什么理论，可以教教俺吗？ 俺对这样的理论很感兴趣.
多谢！
【在 c******8 的大作中提到】
: 既然你是来认真讨论的，我刚才态度不好，sorry！
: 解释一下：我昨天说的是理论上该涨，但我买跌了。当然我也做了backup的control了
: 。毕竟市场很狡猾的。
: 所以你觉得思路矛盾，我没觉得。
|
g******e
发帖数: 998 | 62 thanks very much for posts.
.
experience
incorrect
Rather
【在 m********0 的大作中提到】
: Interpreting the Ratios
: The concept of interpreting the put-call ratios is an easy one in theory,
: but in practice, things become a little more complicated. It is an easy
: matter to say that when the ratio gets too high, you should buy the market.
: Conversely, if the ratio gets too low, you should take bearish positions.
: Quantifying too high and too low is where things get tricky. Past experience
: has shown that static interpretation of the put-call ratios is an incorrect
: approach, for investors and
|
