c****1
发帖数: 5654 | |
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 2 Peter still can make top 20,so he is solid 7.0 |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 3 if he is 7.0, the other would be at least 6.5...
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: Peter still can make top 20,so he is solid 7.0
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 4 没好好打给面子,老头也就5.0,就算当年他年轻时按现在来说也就6.0,因为他是木头拍
打法,随便
找个ATP2000的都能干掉他
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: if he is 7.0, the other would be at least 6.5...
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 5 If you are talking about Pete Sampras, he is just a strong 6.0 now.
It will be difficult for him to enter top 500 in the world.
See Thomas Muster.
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: Peter still can make top 20,so he is solid 7.0
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 6 Sampras didn't play particularly well in the Champions league.
His results this year:
Pete Sampras d. Thomas Muster
6-2, 7-6(3)
Goran Ivanisevic d. Pete Sampras
5-2 retired
Mark Philippoussis d. Pete Sampras
6-3, 7-6(4)
See McEnroe's results:
John McEnroe d. Jay Berger
6-3, 6-3
John McEnroe d. Todd Martin
3-6, 6-3, 10-8
Aaron Krickstein d. John McEnroe
6-3, 4-6, 10-3
McEnroe was obviously more actively trained than Sampras.
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: 没好好打给面子,老头也就5.0,就算当年他年轻时按现在来说也就6.0,因为他是木头拍
: 打法,随便
: 找个ATP2000的都能干掉他
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 7 只要有ATP排名的都是7.0,也就是说2000多,但有些像UCLA之列的第一单打有能力但没打
ATP,所以
有好几千都是7.0
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: If you are talking about Pete Sampras, he is just a strong 6.0 now.
: It will be difficult for him to enter top 500 in the world.
: See Thomas Muster.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 8 Nope, only the top 400 are 7.0.
http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: 只要有ATP排名的都是7.0,也就是说2000多,但有些像UCLA之列的第一单打有能力但没打
: ATP,所以
: 有好几千都是7.0
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 9 Div. 1 Top 75 ranked college
team or player
(commited to, playing, or played
http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
f
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Nope, only the top 400 are 7.0.
: http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 10 They read "NTRP 6.0" from the chart (age 30 and under).
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: Div. 1 Top 75 ranked college
: team or player
: (commited to, playing, or played
:
: http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
: f
|
|
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 11 我们看图不一样,TOP 400 in the world = world class not= 7.0
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: They read "NTRP 6.0" from the chart (age 30 and under).
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 12 如果你看6.5的连ATP都没打过,只是USTA
You are
currently
playing USTA
circuit events
in hopes of a
professional
tennis career
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: They read "NTRP 6.0" from the chart (age 30 and under).
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 13 That corresponds to
"Satellite, Futures, Circuit Players (over # 400 in world)"
in my chart below.
http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
It lists them as NTRP 6.5.
None of "Satellite, Futures, Circuit" events are ATP events.
They are ITF events. The lowest ATP event is an ATP Challenger
event, which is at higher level than any of those three.
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: 如果你看6.5的连ATP都没打过,只是USTA
: You are
: currently
: playing USTA
: circuit events
: in hopes of a
: professional
: tennis career
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 14 那就是说打USTA会有ATP积分?
http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
f
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: That corresponds to
: "Satellite, Futures, Circuit Players (over # 400 in world)"
: in my chart below.
: http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
: It lists them as NTRP 6.5.
: None of "Satellite, Futures, Circuit" events are ATP events.
: They are ITF events. The lowest ATP event is an ATP Challenger
: event, which is at higher level than any of those three.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 15 Yes, but not the "everyday life" USTA league.
For example: $25,000 Rancho Mirage, CA 2010
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: 那就是说打USTA会有ATP积分?
:
: http://assets.usta.com/assets/1/15/General%20_%20Experienced%20
: f
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 16 1没看到ATP积分
2好像也不是WTA
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Yes, but not the "everyday life" USTA league.
: For example: $25,000 Rancho Mirage, CA 2010
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 17 This is a women's pro event, so there is only WTA point.
The following page shows a world# 400+ female player earned
1 point from this event (even though she lost in 1st round).
http://www.wtatennis.com/page/Player/Activity/0,,12781~16049,00
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: 1没看到ATP积分
: 2好像也不是WTA
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 18 那像老大浙大校队算多少合适?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: This is a women's pro event, so there is only WTA point.
: The following page shows a world# 400+ female player earned
: 1 point from this event (even though she lost in 1st round).
: http://www.wtatennis.com/page/Player/Activity/0,,12781~16049,00
|
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 19 his serve is so strong, i don't think u can break him at all... |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 20 So the Chinese player WU, DI, on top 400 in the world, must
be 7.0, can he beat Sampras 6:0, 6:0 now? if Pete is just 6.0? |
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 21 Wu Di is a weak 7.0. Sampras is a strong 6.0. So...
I'd say maybe 6:2, 6:3?
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: So the Chinese player WU, DI, on top 400 in the world, must
: be 7.0, can he beat Sampras 6:0, 6:0 now? if Pete is just 6.0?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 22 Official 4.5 now, hehe.
【在 G**U 的大作中提到】
: 那像老大浙大校队算多少合适?
|
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 23 a weak 4.0 can beat a strong 3.0 6:0, 6:0 easily...
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Wu Di is a weak 7.0. Sampras is a strong 6.0. So...
: I'd say maybe 6:2, 6:3?
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 24 Definitely not easily. They could, but not every time.
In USTA league:
Strong 3.0 >= weak 3.5.
Weak 4.0 <= strong 3.5.
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: a weak 4.0 can beat a strong 3.0 6:0, 6:0 easily...
|
f*****n
发帖数: 18176 | 25 I think nobody here can beat john.
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfJ_fYOX58Q&feature=related
: both are such aggressive players!
|
n*********e
发帖数: 25274 | 26 费德勒快加入他们的队伍了，再过几年，然后所向披靡。 |
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 27 com'n, as i understand:
Strong 3.0 [2.80, 3.0]
weak 3.5 [3.01, 3.20]
who is stronger?
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Definitely not easily. They could, but not every time.
: In USTA league:
: Strong 3.0 >= weak 3.5.
: Weak 4.0 <= strong 3.5.
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | 28 差.5是有的一打的,但差1.0就必败无疑
overlap |
n*********e
发帖数: 25274 | 29 老迈原来是发球上网型啊，动作难看可能是用木拍得缘故？ |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 30 Nope. Weak 3.5 can easily be 2.75.
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: com'n, as i understand:
: Strong 3.0 [2.80, 3.0]
: weak 3.5 [3.01, 3.20]
: who is stronger?
|
|
|
G**U
发帖数: 5492 | |
S***e
发帖数: 4426 | 32 喜欢这样的打法。。。
【在 c****1 的大作中提到】
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfJ_fYOX58Q&feature=related
: both are such aggressive players!
|
c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 33 me2... nice to watch, aggressive, and brave...
i have great volleys too, just need to be braver to move UP!
【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: 喜欢这样的打法。。。
|
