j****u
发帖数: 1413 | |
x*b
发帖数: 253 | 2 Each year hundreds of people become IEEE fellows. I do not understand why it
is a big deal to become an IEEE fellow.
【在 j****u 的大作中提到】
: 经核实，以下新闻内容正确。根据IEEE官方网站报道（
: http://www.ieee.org/web/membership/fellows/Fellows_Class_of_2009.html
: http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs_iportals/iportals/membership/fellows/2009_Fellow_Class.pdf ），中国科技大学校友汤晓鸥（859，香港中文大学）、罗杰波（846，柯达研究实验室）、王善祥（812，斯坦福大学）、胡小平（782，Emory大学）、韩家炜（79届）当选IEEE翰林。
: 详细报道参见：
: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4f0cd9990100bc3w.html
|
d******o
发帖数: 28 | 3 Each year tens of people become Nobel Prize winners. I do not understand why
it is a big deal to become a Nobel Prize winner.
it
【在 x*b 的大作中提到】
: Each year hundreds of people become IEEE fellows. I do not understand why it
: is a big deal to become an IEEE fellow.
|
x*b
发帖数: 253 | 4 It is funny to compare IEEE fellows to Nobel Prize winners.
Each year, only a couple of people can win Nobel Prize in one discipline
while hundreds in the field of EE and CS are elected as IEEE fellows.
why
【在 d******o 的大作中提到】
: Each year tens of people become Nobel Prize winners. I do not understand why
: it is a big deal to become a Nobel Prize winner.
:
: it
|
s******c
发帖数: 1920 | 5 哈哈, catch~!
dude,你又来调皮了
why
【在 d******o 的大作中提到】
: Each year tens of people become Nobel Prize winners. I do not understand why
: it is a big deal to become a Nobel Prize winner.
:
: it
|
s******c
发帖数: 1920 | 6 能当fellow基本也都是本领域内的牛人了，当然不排除有部分水货。
今年当选的里面内地+香港一共也才9个还是10个，其中香港就占了6个
所以还算是个big deal了。
it
【在 x*b 的大作中提到】
: Each year hundreds of people become IEEE fellows. I do not understand why it
: is a big deal to become an IEEE fellow.
|
d******o
发帖数: 28 | 7 It is a very subjective judgement whether becoming an IEEE fellow is a big
deal or not.
No point in arguing that.
But some facts I do know are:
1) MILLIONS of other people in the field of EE and CS have not become IEEE
fellows yet, including many professors in top US EE/CS departments and most
likely yourself.
2) Maybe you are doing much better than these five people, but showing your
respect to other people's achievements will not necessarily make yourself
look bad, instead it will earn yours
【在 x*b 的大作中提到】
: It is funny to compare IEEE fellows to Nobel Prize winners.
: Each year, only a couple of people can win Nobel Prize in one discipline
: while hundreds in the field of EE and CS are elected as IEEE fellows.
:
: why
|
d******o
发帖数: 28 | 8 哈哈，即使努力工作几十年最后成了IEEE fellow还不是no big deal嘛，
所以还不如来灌水玩比较轻松啊，呵呵
【在 s******c 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈, catch~!
: dude,你又来调皮了
:
: why
|
x*b
发帖数: 253 | 9
most
To be qualified as an IEEE fellow or ACM fellow, you have to be a member for
some years. This explains why some top EE/CS professors are neither an ACM
fellow nor IEEE fellow since they just do not bother to be a member.
I am nobody and even not as good as you.
your
This has nothing to do with if I respect them or not. I am just tired of
seeing that our USTC fellows always like to post these kind of things
everywhere.
I only respect those people who make a big contribution to the society n
【在 d******o 的大作中提到】
: It is a very subjective judgement whether becoming an IEEE fellow is a big
: deal or not.
: No point in arguing that.
: But some facts I do know are:
: 1) MILLIONS of other people in the field of EE and CS have not become IEEE
: fellows yet, including many professors in top US EE/CS departments and most
: likely yourself.
: 2) Maybe you are doing much better than these five people, but showing your
: respect to other people's achievements will not necessarily make yourself
: look bad, instead it will earn yours
|
r****y
发帖数: 1437 | 10
for
ACM
Not only that, you have also been nominated by others. If
you are superb but none loves you because you are mean to all of them,
none would nominate you and you have no chance. Once nominated, the bar is
high, but not that high.
Just like school ranking, the difference between Nobel and society
fellow is not linear, but exponential.
I so agree with you, so fed up by these posts.
【在 x*b 的大作中提到】
:
: most
: To be qualified as an IEEE fellow or ACM fellow, you have to be a member for
: some years. This explains why some top EE/CS professors are neither an ACM
: fellow nor IEEE fellow since they just do not bother to be a member.
: I am nobody and even not as good as you.
: your
: This has nothing to do with if I respect them or not. I am just tired of
: seeing that our USTC fellows always like to post these kind of things
: everywhere.
|
|
|
s*****g
发帖数: 5159 | 11 04年的时候IEEE大概有3000个fellow，06年IEEE年报5800多fellow，现在不知道有多少
。一个有6000号fellow的专业协会（甭管会员基数多大），当fellow不知算不算
negative factor。
ACM一直是三四百号，让人觉得舒服很多。
当然IEEE也是有好位置的，honorary member，06年的时候一共28位，都是奠基性人物
，这个也就不觊觎了。
话说回来，今年这几位都不错，都是牛人。
【在 j****u 的大作中提到】
: 经核实，以下新闻内容正确。根据IEEE官方网站报道（
: http://www.ieee.org/web/membership/fellows/Fellows_Class_of_2009.html
: http://www.ieee.org/portal/cms_docs_iportals/iportals/membership/fellows/2009_Fellow_Class.pdf ），中国科技大学校友汤晓鸥（859，香港中文大学）、罗杰波（846，柯达研究实验室）、王善祥（812，斯坦福大学）、胡小平（782，Emory大学）、韩家炜（79届）当选IEEE翰林。
: 详细报道参见：
: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4f0cd9990100bc3w.html
|
o*****h
发帖数: 2082 | 12 提名倒不会是个问题，万人恨的牛人毕竟不多
但是作为一个行业协会，5、6千人的fellow也实在太变态了，不要说和ACM比了，就是
类似的其他较大的工程领域的行业协会，比如ASME, 每年也就选三五十个新fellow
【在 r****y 的大作中提到】
:
: for
: ACM
: Not only that, you have also been nominated by others. If
: you are superb but none loves you because you are mean to all of them,
: none would nominate you and you have no chance. Once nominated, the bar is
: high, but not that high.
: Just like school ranking, the difference between Nobel and society
: fellow is not linear, but exponential.
: I so agree with you, so fed up by these posts.
|
r**t
发帖数: 937 | 13 好像是按比例选的，估计现在会员多了，fellow也就多了
【在 o*****h 的大作中提到】
: 提名倒不会是个问题，万人恨的牛人毕竟不多
: 但是作为一个行业协会，5、6千人的fellow也实在太变态了，不要说和ACM比了，就是
: 类似的其他较大的工程领域的行业协会，比如ASME, 每年也就选三五十个新fellow
|
d******8
发帖数: 2191 | 14
for
ACM
How you think of it is up to you. However, you may consider this as
inspiration. USTC needs more like them.Some university are counting their
glory achievements such as government leaders, regional emperors or
enormorous
campus donations or constructions. Compared with them, we are still clean.
【在 x*b 的大作中提到】
:
: most
: To be qualified as an IEEE fellow or ACM fellow, you have to be a member for
: some years. This explains why some top EE/CS professors are neither an ACM
: fellow nor IEEE fellow since they just do not bother to be a member.
: I am nobody and even not as good as you.
: your
: This has nothing to do with if I respect them or not. I am just tired of
: seeing that our USTC fellows always like to post these kind of things
: everywhere.
|
f******8
发帖数: 260 | |
