s*********t
发帖数: 464 | 1 FUNDS CUT
In the last five years, 777 million were paid by the shareholders of Inter
and Milan: now there’s the stop.
Juve are different as they’re facing the deficit.
The Italian patronage is at dusk as if they want to adapt to the spirit of
the current time. Recession, the chase to balance budgets and of course the
financial fair play have said enough with the spending spree. Elsewhere,
however, spending money continues to run crazy from the sheiks, the
oligarchs, and even the Chinese. The question is: how can our team resist on
the international scene? While Inter and Milan are chasing austerity, Juve
have been investing in order to strengthen its team. All teams including
these big three seem like wasting their effort in order to compete with
Abramovic and Mansour in any bidding war for top players. Our football has
gone from a luxurious restaurant to a pizzeria (like Galliani said) and what
will be the time when Berlusconi and Moratti – as announced – limit the
injections of money into their respective club?
Covered- It is a vicious cycle that we’re going to tell you. It is about to
organizations, Inter and Milan which, historically, have always been
supported and maintained by the shareholders. Let’s limit ourselves to the
past five years, the Nerazzurri’s shareholders have effectively made
payments on capital account (or recapitalization) for 567.4 million and 209.
5 million for the Rossoneri. So the carousel of the transfer market has made
it a necessity to sell valuable pieces. Just look at the balance of
acquisitions-sales from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012: + 25 million for Milan, + 15
for Inter, on the same plus level is also Manchester United at + 24 million
. Why all this? Simple, the last five years, funding coming from Moratti and
Berlusconi has been essential to offset the budget shortfalls (665.3
million in total for Inter, 245.4 for Milan). Revenues from Television right
, as a result of sharing collective, marketing and stadium are not taking
off while what’s left are mountains of salaries which are no longer
tolerable. So with less money coming in, then you also have UEFA with its
slogan of “spend only what you have.”
Crisis- It is true that the relationship between costs and turnover of Inter
(88%) and Milan (85%) are on the same wavelength as the crazy spenders in
Chelsea (85%) and Manchester City (114%). The difference is that Abramovich
and Mansour have no intention of stopping regardless of the financial crisis
for financial fair play. Moratti and Berlusconi, however, must deal with
the difficulties of their respective companies: the stock market of the
former Italian Prime Minister has halved from 3.5 billion in 2011 to 1.9 in
2012 and Mediaset has filed its first quarter with a 85% drop in profit.
Saras is still in the red zone and decided not to distribute dividends.
However for Juventus, they have followed different strategies: it is not a
coincidence that they are among the big spenders on the transfer market with
a negative balance of 139 million. However, the payroll of Juventus is
fairly low at the 10th spot in Europe. | s*********t
发帖数: 464 | 2 It is true that the relationship between costs and turnover of Inter
(88%) and Milan (85%) are on the same wavelength as the crazy spenders in
Chelsea (85%) and Manchester City (114%).
relationship between costs and turnover 什么意思？貌似比率越高越不好？ | s*********t
发帖数: 464 | |
|
